The stone paradox sounds like a challenge to God's omnipotence. It is actually a logical contradiction dressed as a question — and logical contradictions are not things, for any power to bring about.
The question is posed as a dilemma: can God create a stone so heavy He cannot lift it? If He can, then there is something He cannot do — lift the stone. If He cannot, then there is also something He cannot do — create it. Either way, the argument concludes, God is not truly omnipotent.
It is a clever construction. It is also built on a misunderstanding of what omnipotence actually means — and it commits a logical fallacy in the process.
The argument works by silently substituting a false definition of omnipotence for the real one, then refuting the false version. This is called a straw man fallacy: misrepresent the opponent's position, attack the misrepresentation, and claim victory over the original.
A political version of this looks familiar: Candidate A proposes a modest tax increase on the wealthy. Candidate B responds by accusing A of wanting to confiscate everyone's income and impose socialism. Candidate B has not engaged the actual proposal — they have attacked a distorted version of it. The same move is happening in the stone paradox.
The word omnipotent comes from the Latin omnis (all) and potens (powerful). It means all-powerful. But the critical question is: all-powerful to do what?
If "anything" means "anything that can be expressed in words, including logical contradictions," then yes — God cannot create a four-sided triangle, a married bachelor, or a stone too heavy for an infinitely powerful being to lift. But these are not things. They are grammatically coherent arrangements of words that describe no possible reality. The inability to produce them is not a limitation of power. It is the nature of logic itself.
The Christian theological definition of omnipotence has always been clear: God can do anything that is logically possible. This is not a retreat from the claim of omnipotence — it is a recognition that logical contradictions are not things God lacks the power to do. They are simply not things at all.
The Bible itself acknowledges that God "cannot" do certain things — He cannot lie, He cannot deny Himself (Hebrews 6:18; 2 Timothy 2:13; Titus 1:2). This is not a limitation of His power. It is a description of His nature. God cannot contradict what He is, because He is the standard of reality itself.
Under the correct definition of omnipotence, God has infinite lifting power — no maximum, no ceiling, no upper bound. For a stone to be too heavy for God to lift, it would have to exceed infinite weight. That is not a description of a very heavy stone. It is a logical contradiction — the same category as a six-sided square or a three-horned unicorn.
The question "Can God create a stone too heavy for Him to lift?" sounds like a question about power. It is actually a question about whether logical contradictions can exist — and the answer is no, not because God is limited, but because contradictions are not real things for any power, finite or infinite, to bring about.
The paradox does not expose a weakness in God. It exposes a weakness in the question.
May the Lord bless you and keep you.
About the author
I'm a Catholic layman from Fort Lauderdale, Florida. No seminary, no credentials — just a deep love for the Faith and a conviction that ordinary Catholics are called to evangelize.
The perpetual virginity of Mary — the teaching that Mary remained a virgin before, during, and after the birth of Jesus — is one of the oldest and most consistently held beliefs in Catholic and Orthodox Christianity.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter for curated inspiration, delivered to your inbox.
We never share your data. See Privacy Policy for more info.
